Her Name is Ann

Here’s a picture of Ann Schwartz.  (From her Facebook page)

It has been deduced that her husband is a Greenberg.  They are pictured here at Riley Harmon’s bat mitzvah in 2007.  (See wellaware1.com for more on the significance of this family.)

Thanks to Alex (celticrebel.wordpress.com) for this discovery.

Also, below are two pictures of Randy Zuckerberg.  She looks just like Ann Schwartz.

 

According to Wikipedia, Randy Zuckerberg is an American internet entrepreneur, the former marketing director of Facebook, and older sister of the company’s co-founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg.

If you have been following Ed Chiarini’s work, you will be aware of the overwhelmingly convincing evidence showing that “Mark Zuckerberg” is an alias used by Jacob Michael (Jake) Greenberg, a young man who plays the role of Facebook’s CEO.  Below is a picture of Jake taken in 2007, with his mother, father, and brother.

And here, below, is Jake’s mugshot from his arrest on February 17, 2012, alongside a photo of “Mark Zuckerberg.”

 

If “Mark Zuckerberg” is a fictitious character, it stands to reason that “Randy Zuckerberg” is, too.

Besides looking exactly like Randy Zuckerberg, Ann also looks exactly like the women in the following pictures.

 

Above:  (1) Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook COO; and (2) Tucson police detective Cindy Butierez; (3) Roxanna Green; and (4) Detective Butierez again

   

Above:  (1) Roxanna Green and daughter, Christina Taylor Green; (2) RoseMarie Terenzio; (3) Georgina Kelly and daughter Rebecca Black

   

Above:  Sara Weaver Balter; Vicki Weaver and baby; and Andrea Mackris

 

Above:  (1) Megan and Jeff Rense; and (2) her own self with Robert De Niro 

Alex, the Celtic Rebel, who has a radio show on oraclebroadcasting.com every Sunday-Monday night, has released a poster below identifying Ann Schwartz…

…as playing the role of “Teri Buhl.”

Teri Buhl is a financial reporter who writes a blog and sometimes appears on The Keiser Report on Russia Today.

You can see a better image of the poster below on the Alex’s blog, celticrebel.wordpress.com.

Teri Buhl is is having some legal difficulties in New Canaan, CT, which have been covered in an online local “newspaper” NewCanaanPatch.com.  This newspaper (so to speak, i.e., it isn’t made of paper) is part of Patch.com, which says this about itself:

We’re a community-specific news and information platform dedicated to providing comprehensive and trusted local coverage for individual towns and communities.

Basically, it works like a kind of centrally-managed Facebook for small-town news.  A main office in NYC hires agents, er, I mean reporters, in a nationwide small-town news network.  If you are conspiracy minded, you might view this as an e-intelligence operation targeting small communities.  Actually, if you look at things that way, its function dovetails perfectly with Facebook, which can theoretically be used for both the collection and the controlled dissemination of information/disinformation at the personal level.

Patch.com is owned by AOL.

I don’t know whether the same people are involved in both enterprises.  However, it might be something worth thinking about.

Now, as mentioned before, Teri Buhl has some legal woes to deal with.  (see http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetail.aspx?source=Pending&Key=aa24bcd9-c073-45ad-81cf-e1df3c9f6d2a)

Teri Buhl and her lawyer, Christopher Caldwell, in court.  The photo appears to have been taken from the point of view of the bailiff or the prosecutor.  Are news photographers usually allowed in the front of the court?  Actually, I thought photography wasn’t allowed at all.

An article in Greenwichtime.com (an online Hearst owned publication for which Teri Buhl used to write) dated May 3, 2012, reports:

Buhl, 39, of New Canaan, was charged in November 2010 with second-degree harassment, second-degree breach of peace and interfering with a police investigation after New Canaan police said she posted on Facebook parts of the 17-year-old’s journal detailing sexual activity at a drinking party.

As the STORY goes, the 17-year-old girl was the daughter of Buhl’s boyfriend.

Assuming this drama is actually true, it’s unusual that (a) Buhl hasn’t settled the matter quietly ($$$) with the family and let the whole thing fade away, or (b) accepted the state’s offer of Accelerated Rehabilitation, which I think means two years of probation and then having the matter wiped from her record.  Instead, Buhl is actually going to have a jury trial in September, and in the process she is churning up as much publicity and controversy as possible in her blog.

It looks like the jury will have to decide whether  (1) a nosy, bitchy, jealous girlfriend tried to make life difficult for her boyfriend’s daughter by publishing embarrassing personal documents on the internet, or (2) an independent, courageous journalist was single-handedly waging a crusade against teenage drinking and sexual misbehavior in an upscale suburban townand defending a journalists moral duty to not reveal her sources.

However, I’m inclined to think this DRAMA is just a story invented to get people riled up.  What really matters is WHY they’re doing this — what changes they hope to make in the law or in the attitudes of the peasantry.

I read somewhere (can’t remember where) that Buhl’s lawyer is going to make this into a free speech issue by likening what she did to the case where some weird church in Kansas was sued for picketing soldiers’ funerals with signs saying “God hates fags.”  The Supreme Court ruled that those bizarre demonstrations were constitutionally protected free speech.  Perhaps this is a way of psychologically linking the public’s deepest feelings of patriotism and reverence with a hatred of homophobes.  Making that issue part of this case would keep awareness of those religious homophobes alive and current in people’s minds.

It kind of syncs, too, with the Tyler Clementi case, where intimate, private matters were published by some busybody in the electronic media.  Of course, since the girl in question is presumably heterosexual, and even though the actual crime was the same, it won’t outrage anyone because it’s not a “bias crime.”

Of course, it could just lead to more frequent enforcement of the Connecticut law against allowing “children” less than 21 years old to drink.  More $fines and $fees and $prisoners for the enforcement-judicial-prison complex!

Time will tell.

Update:  The trial did not go forward in September.  The next court date is scheduled for January 28, 2013.

Disclaimer:  The photographs herein are presented for purposes of observation, comparison, analysis, discussion, and education, as well as to advance awareness of civic, moral, religious, and social justice issues.  No profit accrues therefrom.  This constitutes “fair use” under 17 USC Sec. 107.

• Posted in: Uncategorized